DIVINE PRINCIPLE
PART I
CHAPTER 6
PREDESTINATION
กก
It is true that theological controversies about "Predestination" have
caused great confusion in the religious lives of many Christians. We must
understand what brought this about.
In the Bible, there are many passages that could be interpreted to mean
that the fortune or misfortune, happiness or misery of any individual, as
well as the salvation or damnation of fallen men and the rise and fall of
nations, all occur according to God's predestination. For example, the Bible
says:
Those whom He predestined He also called; and those whom He called He
also justified; and those whom He justified He also glorified. (Rom. 8:30)
Again it says:
...'I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on
whom I have compassion.'. So it depends not upon man's will or exertion, but
upon God's mercy. (Rom. 9:15-16)
It again says (Rom. 9:21), "Has the potter no right over the clay, to
make out of the same lump one vessel for beauty and another for menial
use?". It also says (Rom. 9:11-13) that God loved Jacob and hated Esau while
they were still in their mother's womb, and said the elder would serve the
younger.
In this way, there are ample Biblical grounds to justify "complete
predestination". But we must not forget that there are also many Biblical
passages that deny complete predestination. For example, when we see that
God warned the first human ancestors not to eat of the fruit (Gen. 2:17) in
order to prevent them from falling, it is evident that man's fall was not
God's predestination but the result of man's disobedience to God's
commandment. Again we read (Gen. 6:6), that God was sorry that He had put
man on earth. If man had fallen according to God's predestination, there
would be no reason for Him to be sorry for His having created man, whose
fall He would have predestined. John 3:16 says that whoever believes in
Christ shall not perish.
When we read in Matthew 7:7, "Ask, and it will be given you; seek, and
you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you.", we can see well enough
that all things are not accomplished merely by the predestination of God,
but by human endeavor. If all things are to be accomplished solely by God's
predestination, why did God so emphasize human efforts? Again, when we read
that we should pray for sick brothers (James 5:14), we can understand that
suffering due to sickness is not by the predestination of God. If all things
were inevitably decided by God's predestination, there would be no need for
man's tearful prayers.
If we accept the traditional belief of predestination, man's prayers,
evangelism, charity and other human endeavors would be of no use whatsoever
to God's providence of restoration; and any such endeavor would ultimately
be useless. This is because the predestination of God, who is absolute,
should also be absolute, without leaving room for any change due to human
effort.
Since there are sufficient Biblical grounds to justify either acceptance
or rejection of the theory of predestination, controversies over the
doctrine of predestination are inevitable. How, then, would the Principle
solve such problems? Let us investigate the question of predestination.
SECTION I - PREDESTINATION OF THE WILL
Let us first define "will" before discussing predestination of the will.
God could not accomplish His purpose of creation due to the human fall.
Therefore, the will of God, in working His providence with fallen man, is to
accomplish His purpose of creation. In other words, the "will" means the
fulfillment of the purpose of the providence of restoration.
Next, we must know that God first determines the will, and then works to
accomplish it. Having created man, God set up His will to accomplish the
purpose of creation; however, due to the human fall, He was unable to
accomplish the will. Naturally, in order to accomplish it, He has to
determine His will a second time, and thus He carries out the providence of
restoration.
God predestines the will to be one of goodness, not of evil; then He
works to accomplish it. Since God is the essence of goodness, His purpose of
creation must also be one of goodness. Naturally, the purpose of His
providence of restoration must be good, and His will to accomplish this
purpose must also be good. God could not have predestined that which
obstructs and is against the purpose of creation. Thus, we know that He
could not have predetermined such things as the human fall, judgment of
fallen men, or the destruction of the universe. If such evil results had
been the necessary product of God's predestination, He would not have
regretted the evil result of His own predestination, and we could not think
of God as the subject of goodness. God, looking at fallen men, was sorry
that He had made man on earth (Gen 6:6); and, seeing King Saul's
faithlessness, He repented that He had made Saul king (I Sam. 15:11). This
is good evidence that these events were not the result of God's
predestination. Such evil results occur from man's failure to accomplish his
portion of responsibility, and from his being on the side of Satan.
To what extent does God predetermine the will to accomplish His purpose
of creation? God is the absolute being--unique, eternal, and unchangeable;
so God's purpose of creation must be the same. Accordingly, the will of the
providence of restoration, which is to accomplish the purpose of creation,
should be unique, unchangeable, and absolute (Is. 46:11). God predetermines
the will to be absolute; so, when a person chosen for the will fails to
accomplish it, God must go on to fulfill it, even by setting up another
person in place of the one who failed.
For example, when God's will to fulfill the purpose of creation centering
on Adam failed, He sent Jesus as the second Adam, attempting to fulfill the
will centering on him, because His predestination of the will was absolute.
When this will was again a failure, due to the disbelief of the people (cf.
Part I, Ch. 4, Sec. I, 2--141), Jesus promised the Lord would come and
fulfill the will without fail (Matt. 16:27). Again, in Adam's family, God
intended to lay the foundation to receive the Messiah through His providence
centered on Cain and Abel.
However, this will ended in failure when Cain killed Abel. Then, God
intended to accomplish His will through Noah's family. When Noah's family
failed to accomplish this will, God had to set up Abraham to fulfill the
will. In another instance, God intended to fulfill the will which Abel
failed to accomplish by setting up Seth (Gen. 4:25). Also, He attempted to
fulfill the will unaccomplished by Moses by choosing Joshua in his stead
(Josh. 1:5); and again, He tried to fulfill the will unaccomplished due to
the betrayal of Judas Iscariot by electing Matthias (Acts 1:15).
SECTION II - PREDESTINATION FOR THE FULFILLMENT OF THE WILL
As clarified in the "Principle of Creation", God's purpose of creation is
to be fulfilled only by man's accomplishment of his portion of
responsibility. The will for the providence of restoration, which is to
fulfill this purpose, being absolute, is not for man to interfere with;
however, man must accomplish his own portion of responsibility in order for
the will to be accomplished. Therefore, God's purpose of creation was to be
fulfilled only through man's accomplishing his portion of responsibility by
not eating of the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (Gen.
2:17).
Accordingly, even in accomplishing the purpose of the providence of
restoration, the will can be fulfilled only through the accomplishment of
man's responsibility by the central figure in charge of the mission. In
Jesus' day, the people should have believed in Jesus absolutely, in order
that he might accomplish the purpose of the providence of salvation. But due
to their disbelief, they could not accomplish their portion of
responsibility, and naturally, the accomplishment of the will had to be
postponed to the day of the Second Advent.
Then, to what degree and to what extent would God predetermine the
accomplishment of the will? As mentioned, God's will to accomplish the
purpose of the providence of restoration is absolute, but the accomplishment
of the will is relative. So, it is predetermined that the will is to be
accomplished, but only through God's 95 percent responsibility and man's 5
percent responsibility combined. Indicating the proportion of man's
responsibility as 5 percent is only to say that man's responsibility is
extremely small compared to God's. Nevertheless, we must understand that,
for man, it means 100 percent effort.
To cite examples: the accomplishment of the will centering on Adam and
Eve was predestined to be fulfilled by the fulfillment of their own portion
of responsibility, namely, by not eating of the fruit of the Tree of the
Knowledge of Good and Evil. The providence of restoration centering on Noah
was predestined to be fulfilled by the accomplishment of his own portion of
responsibility, through his loyalty in building the ark. The providence of
salvation through Jesus was predestined to be accomplished through the
fulfillment of responsibility on the part of fallen men by their believing
in Jesus as the Messiah and following him (John 3:16). Men have caused the
prolongation of God's providence of restoration by not fulfilling even their
small amount of responsibility.
The Bible says, "The prayer of faith will save the sick man." (James
5:15); "Your faith has made you well." (Mark 5:34); "For every one who asks
receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened."
(Matt. 7:8). All these Biblical passages prove that the will is predestined
to be fulfilled by the accomplishment of man's own portion of
responsibility. We can understand well enough how small were the
responsibilities men took charge of in all these instances, compared to
God's responsible portion of toil and grace.
At the same time, from the fact that through their failure to accomplish
their portions of responsibility, the central figures in the providence were
compelled to cause the prolongation of the providence of restoration, we can
well imagine how extremely difficult it was for them to fulfill even a
relatively small responsibility.
SECTION III - PREDESTINATION OF MAN
Adam and Eve could have become good human ancestors if they had
accomplished their own portion of responsibility by obeying God's injunction
not to eat the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, but they
failed to do so. Therefore, God could not predestine them, absolutely, to be
good human ancestors. In the case of fallen men, a chosen man could become a
person of God's predestination only by accomplishing his own portion of
responsibility. Therefore, God cannot predestine a certain person with
absolute certainty that he will become what he is predestined to be.
Then, to what degree does God predestine man? In God's accomplishment of
His will, centering on a certain person, He establishes it as an
indispensable condition that the man must fulfill his own portion of
responsibility. Therefore, God, in predestining a person for a certain
mission, determines that the person will be what he is predestined to be
only by the 100 percent accomplishment of the will centering on the person,
with God's portion of 95 percent responsibility and man's portion of 5
percent responsibility accomplished together. Therefore, if the person fails
to accomplish his own portion of responsibility, he cannot become the person
God predestined.
For example, when God chose Moses, He predestined him to be the great
leader capable of bringing the elected people to the blessed land of Canaan,
but only by accomplishing his own portion of responsibility (Ex. 3:10). When
in Kadesh-barnea Moses went against God's will by striking the rock twice,
he failed to carry out his responsibility, thus nullifying God's
predestination; he died on the way to the appointed place (Num. 20:7-12,
20:24, 27:14). Likewise, when God chose Judas Iscariot, He predestined him
to be Jesus' apostle if he accomplished his own portion of responsibility
with loyalty. However, since Judas failed to carry out his responsibility,
God's predestination was not fulfilled and Judas turned out to be a
betrayer.
When God called the Jewish people, He predestined them to be the chosen
nation of glory, but only by fulfilling their portion of responsibility
through their faith and service. Nevertheless, the predestination was not
realized because they delivered Jesus to be crucified; and therefore, the
chosen nation was scattered.
Next, let us examine the conditions and qualifications for becoming the
central figure of the providence of restoration in God's predestination. The
purpose of God's providence of salvation is to restore the fallen world to
the original world of creation. Though the times of their salvation may
differ, all fallen men are predestined to be saved (II Peter 3:9). Just as
with the process of His creation, God's providence of salvation, which is
the providence of re-creation, cannot be accomplished in a moment.
Therefore, this providence is gradually broadening its scope to cover the
whole, starting from "one". Thus, in the predestination of the providence of
salvation, God first predestines the central figure and calls him to the
mission.
What conditions and qualifications must this central figure have? First,
he must be born out of the chosen nation, in charge of the providence of
restoration. Next, even within the chosen nation, he must be the descendant
of ancestors with many accomplishments of goodness. Then, even though he may
be the descendant of ancestors with many good deeds, he must be endowed with
the natural disposition suitable for the accomplishment of the will. Even if
a man has these endowments, he must subsequently have good conditions in
which to grow and work in his lifetime. Still, even among these persons, God
would select first the individual most fully prepared at the appropriate
time and place of God's need.
SECTION IV - ELUCIDATION OF BIBLICAL VERSES WHICH JUSTIFY THE
THEORY OF PREDESTINATION
We have clarified many problems concerning God's predestination. But the
problem yet to be solved is how to elucidate the Biblical records, such as
those enumerated in the introduction to this chapter, which are written as
though all things are of God's absolute predestination.
Let us first elucidate Romans 8:29-30, which says:
For those whom He foreknew He also predestined...and those whom He
predestined He also called; and those whom He called He also justified; and
those whom He justified He also glorified.
God, being omniscient, knows who is endowed with the qualities to be the
central figure in the providence of restoration (cf. Sec. III--199).
Therefore, God predestines and calls the person He foreknew in order to
fulfill the purpose of the providence of restoration. Calling the person is
God's portion of responsibility, but this alone has nothing to do with the
person's being justified and finally glorified in God. He must accomplish
his own responsibility in the position of a person called by God before he
can be justified; only after he is thus justified will he be glorified by
God. It is predestined that man can enjoy glory from God only by
accomplishing his own portion of responsibility. There are no words such as
"man's own portion of responsibility" in the Bible, so everything appears to
be accomplished merely by God's absolute predestination.
The Bible says (Rom. 9:15-16):
...'I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on
whom I have compassion.'. So it depends not upon man's will or exertion, but
upon God's mercy.
As elucidated above, God chooses the one who is most suitable for the
fulfillment of the purpose of restoration, foreknowing all his qualities.
Therefore, it is God's privilege to elect such a person and to have mercy on
him or have compassion for him. It depends not upon man's desire or
endeavor. These Biblical verses are given in order to emphasize the power
and grace of God.
It is again said (Rom. 9:21):
Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one
vessel for beauty and another for menial use?
It has already been said that God set up man's own portion of
responsibility as the condition to exalt him to be the lord of all creation
and to love him most by having man take after His creative nature. However,
man fell, having violated this condition. Therefore, man became an existence
deserted like trash; so this verse was given to teach people that man has no
right to complain against whatever way God may handle men of this kind.
Further, the Bible states that God loved Jacob but hated Esau, and that
"The elder will serve the younger." (Rom. 9:10-13). What must have been the
reason that God loved Jacob and hated Esau while they were not yet born and
had done nothing, either good or bad? This was to fulfill God's program in
the course of the providence of restoration. Further details will be
discussed in the section covering the providence of restoration centering on
Abraham's family (cf. Part II, Ch. 1, Sec. III--261). We must understand
here that God gave Isaac twin sons, Esau and Jacob, because He had to
restore through indemnity the will for the restoration of the birthright,
which had been left unaccomplished by Cain's killing of Abel in Adam's
family. This He intended to do by setting up the twin brothers, in the
positions of Cain and Abel, and by having Jacob (in the position of Abel)
make Esau (in the position of Cain) give in. God said this because Esau,
being in the position of Cain, was liable to be hated by God, while Jacob,
being in the position of Abel, was entitled to His love.
God's actually either loving or hating one or the other depended upon the
fulfillment of their respective portions of responsibility. In fact, Esau,
having surrendered in obedience to Jacob, received a blessing of love equal
to Jacob's though he was in the position liable to be hated by God. On the
other hand, Jacob, though he was in the position to be loved by God, could
not have received such love if he had failed to accomplish his portion of
responsibility.
It was because of ignorance about the relationship of man's portion of
responsibility to God's in fulfilling the purpose of the providence of
restoration that there appeared a man like Calvin, who obstinately held to
his "theory of predestination", and that such a theory has been believed by
so many people for so long. |